The effectiveness of virtual and face-to-face training of digital immigrants on learning biology

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Farhangian University, Tehran. Iran

2 Ph.D. in Educational Psychology. Visiting Professor, Farhangian University, Nasibeh Center. Tehran.Iran.

Abstract

This study was conducted with the aim of investigating the effectiveness of virtual and face-to-face education on students' learning. The research method is semi-experimental. The statistical population is high school girls of the 2nd high school of region 15. The studied sample is 57 students from the twelfth grade of the experimental field studying in the year 1400-1401. The sampling method was cluster random. The research tool was the teacher-made test at the end of the first semester in January and the national test at the end of the second semester in June of Biology 3. The analysis method of one-sample t-test and paired t-test was performed using spss24 software. The T value obtained from the examination of the virtual education method test is equal to 11.977 and since this value is higher than the critical T value of ±1.96, as a result, the effect of virtual education is accepted at the confidence level of 99% (p<0.01) and this The effect is higher than the desired situation. The value of T obtained from the examination of face-to-face training methods is 2.579 and since this value is higher than the critical T value of ±1.96, as a result, the effect of face-to-face training is accepted at the confidence level of 99% (p<0.01) and It can be argued that face-to-face teaching methods have had an effect in the 3rd biology course, and this effect is higher than the desired situation. Paired t-test shows that the average difference of virtual training (3.95), at the level (p<0.01) is more effective than face-to-face training.

Keywords

References

حاجی بابایی، مهدی؛ پردلی، مصطفی. (1399). تأثیر آموزش‌های مجازی درس زیست‌شناسی بر میزان خلاقیت دانش‌ آموزان رشته علوم تجربی (مطالعه موردی دانش‌آموزان پایه دهم منطقه 9 آموزش‌وپرورش تهران. پژوهش در آموزش زیست‌شناسی2(2):65-76.
سیف، علی­اکبر.(1400). سنجش فرآیند و فراورده یادگیری. نشر دوران. تهران چاپ دهم.
سیف، علی­اکبر.(1401). روش‌های اندازه‌گیری و ارزشیابی آموزشی. نشر دوران. تهران چاپ پنجاه‌وهشت.  
غلامی، اعظم؛ جلالی، حوا. (2020). تأثیر آموزش مجازی بر میزان یادگیری درس زیست‌شناسی در دانش آموزان دختر پایه یازدهم شهرستان دلگان. پویش در آموزش علوم پایه, 5(17): 1-21.
فرزین، حمیدرضا؛ جمشیدیان مجاور؛ مجید, امیری؛ محدثه, خواستار, علی (1399) ارزیابی وضعیت آموزش مجازی درس زیست شناسی در بین دانش آموزان دختر پایه یازدهم شهرستان بجنورد. پژوهش در آموزش زیست شناسی.2(1):19-28.
ناصری، فاطمه؛ جوادی پور، محمد؛ موحدی، محمد. (1401). مقایسه اثر بخشی روش آموزش حضوری و مجازی بر یادگیری و یادداری دانش آموزان پسر دوره ابتدایی شهر قم. چشم انداز برنامه درسی و آموزش(1)2
نصراله زاده حق گو، امین؛ دهقان منشادی، زهرا السادات. (1399). بررسی تأثیر ابزارهای الکترونیکی در آموزش زیست‌شناسی در دوران کرونا. پژوهش در آموزش زیست شناسی (3)2: 48-25
Albino, M. (2021). Technology tool in teaching biology: A mixed reality mobile application. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Explorer (IJMRE), 3:43-46.
Anas, I., & Hamzah, S. R. (2022). Predicting career adaptability of fresh graduates through personal factors. European Journal of Training and Development,46(3/4),302-316.
Asare, I., & Parker, J. (2022). Students’ Perception on Web-Based Technology in Teaching Biology in College of Education. Science Education International, 33(2), 242-250.
Fiedler, S. T., Heyne, T., & Bogner, F. X. (2022). Closing the Gap: Potentials of ESE Distance Teaching. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8330.
Gorman, L. (2022). Reflections on COVID: Comparison of Teaching Methods and Outcomes for Virtual vs In‐Person Preclinical Integrated Medical School Pharmacology Education. The FASEB Journal, 36(S1), R4359.
Hill, J. (2021). Teaching science in a virtual environment: The case of excellence academy during the pandemic (Doctoral dissertation), 1-97.
Koroleva, E. (2022). Attitude Towards Using Fintech Services: Digital Immigrants Versus Digital Natives. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 2250029.
Kuhn, C. (2022). Students agency in the emergency remote teaching landscape. In Digital Learning in Higher Education (pp. 37-45). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Prensky, M. (2022). EMPOWERED!: Re-framing ‘Growing Up’for a New Age. EAI Press.
 
Rudenkin, D. V. (2022). Online learning: Attitudes of Russian students. The Education and science journal, 24(5), 181-205.
Subashini, N., Udayanga, L., De Silva, L. H. N., Edirisinghe, J. C., & Nafla, M. N. (2022). Undergraduate perceptions on transitioning into E-learning for continuation of higher education during the COVID pandemic in a developing country: a cross-sectional study from Sri Lanka. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 1-12.
Xue, K., Huggins-Manley, A. C., & Leite, W. (2022). Semisupervised learning method to adjust biased item difficulty estimates caused by nonignorable missingness in a virtual learning environment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 82(3), 539-567.
  Zhang, B., Peng, G., Liu, C., Zhang, Z. J., & Jasimuddin, S. M. (2022). Adaptation behaviour in using one-stop smart governance apps: an exploratory study between digital immigrants and digital natives. Electronic Markets, 1-21.
Research in Biology Education
Volume 3, Issue 2 - Serial Number 9
February 2022
Pages 51-64

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics